Sex Marriage Relationship

Sample details Pages: 13 Words: 3923 Downloads: 9 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Psychology Essay Tags: Same Sex Marriage Essay Did you like this example? Same-Sex Marriages Executive Summary The public policy explored in this analysis will include section one from the family code titles, marriage relationship. This issue is more prevalent than most would imagine. In 1990 the American bureau of census reported 145,130 same-gender unmarried couples living together. That number is reported to have increased to 594,691 by the year 2000 (Pawelski et al., 2006). According to President Bush, it is up to the individual state to determine any legal arrangements other than marriage. This leaves the definition of marriage up to the individual governments. It is essential to define the different unions as well as have a strong understanding of the implications of each within the state of Texas. According to Bogenschnider, Theory of Paradox consists of three camps that view issues from different angles. The concerned camp tends to be more conservative with their views on the family. It also strives to protect the traditional family values. The sanguine camp is more concerned with the welfare of the children, as well as the individual rights of people of all sexual orientations. The impatient camp seeks progress and respects all members of the community regardless of the concern for the traditional family values. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Sex Marriage Relationship | Psychology Dissertations" essay for you Create order The concerned camp views same-sex marriage as an insult to the historical family unit and the foundations from which the family system was derived. This group is concerned with the research indicating that many stressors responsible for creating significant amount of anxiety and distress for those in the homosexual relationships. This camp is also concerned that regardless of their lifestyle homosexual individuals are still required to conform to traditional heterosexual family styles in order to adopt, regardless of the findings. (I dont understand this sentence, regardless of what findings?) The teenagers facing their homosexual lifestyle were also found to be more at risk for negative behaviors, including substance abuse and suicide. The concerned camp desires to see the traditional family unit remain intact for the welfare of all individuals, especially the children. The sanguine camp views recent family changes positively as indicators of the capacity of families to adapt to new environments rather than symptoms of decline. The sanguine camp considers the positive results of these family changes for individuals, especially women. The sanguine camp contends that children have the capacity to overcome the emotional upheaval and long term consequences of divorce. They tend to focus on people who have thrived in the midst of family change. The sanguine camp regards marriage, commitment and nurturance as unchanging core American values no matter what. Contenders of this view declare that the dramatic changes in the last quarter century were not about family value but about norms and standards regarding appropriate or inappropriate behavior. For example, cohabitation before marriage became common and one of four children born outside of marriage but majority still want to be married. Regarding policy-making, the greatest concern for the sanguine camp is individual freedom. They want to keep the American core values and establish the institutional supports to help families during rapid changes. The impatient camp acknowledges the change and growth in the diversity of alternative families and their structure. Qualitative research is respected and much of the evidence regarding childrens behavioral and cognitive outcomes incorporates teacher responses along with parent responses. The research supports the changes towards same-sex marriage and welcomes significant positive research findings that support their cause. This camp suggests that families do face challenges, but ultimately have numerous opportunities to demonstrate their resilience though this alternative lifestyle. The recognition of same-sex marriages would alleviate significant amount of stress from those families who are a part of a homosexual partnership. The recognition of this partnership would allow for society to also recognize the partnership leading to a more accepted perspective. The children in these families, as demonstrated by the research results, remain near the average mark in development. However, they continue to have difficulty comprehending and accepting the lifestyle affecting their emotional and social developments. State of Texas can alleviate this stress for these individuals by recognizing these same-sex marriages and providing the same right to homosexual couples that it safeguards for heterosexual individuals. Providing this recognition will allow for all families in the state of Texas to have the same resources, rights, and privileges creating a stronger, more united state, community, and families. Public Policy Project: Same-sex Marriages The public policy explored in this analysis will include section one from the family code titles, marriage relationship. This issue is more prevalent than most would imagine. In 1990 the American bureau of census reported 145,130 same-gender unmarried couples living together . That number is reported to have increased to 594,691 by the year 2000 (Pawelski et al., 2006). According to President Bush, it is up to the individual state to determine any legal arrangements other than marriage. This leaves the definition of marriage up to the individual governments. It is essential to define the different unions as well as have a strong understanding of the implications of each within the state of Texas (question 1). A civil union is a legal mechanism, sanctioned by civil authority, intended to grant same-sex couples legal status somewhat similar to civil marriage. In the United States, civil unions have been established only in Vermont, Massachusetts, and Connecticut. In theses tates, same-sex couples are granted the same state-level rights, benefits, and protections as those granted to heterosexual married couples. No other states recognize civil unions. As such, same-sex couples considered to be legally united in either of those states are treated as single individuals when they cross into other states. A domestic partnership is a relationship between two individuals, often but not necessarily of the same gender, who live together and mutually support one another as spouses but who are not legally joined in a civil marriage or a civil union. Some same-sex couples enter into domestic partnership agreements to create legally enforceable contracts involving property, finances, inheritance, and/or health care. Domestic partnerships do not reach the same legal threshold as civil unions or civil marriages and, accordingly, do not afford couples the rights, benefits,and protections of civil marriage (Pawelski et al., 2006). The definitions are helpful but in the state of Texas any same-sex unions/marriages are banned. Protecting the sanctity of life and marriage at the 79th Texas state Congress 2005, Texans voted on a constitutional amendment defining marriage in fall of 2005. SJR 6 defines marriage as between one man and one woman. Texas voters adopted this amendment on November 8, 2005. Texas now joins 14 states that statutorily and constitutionally ban same-sex marriage. Significant research has been conducted on this topic from many perspectives. It is essential to understand the effect of same-sex relationships on the family system and the individuals within that system. It is very difficult for those in a same-sex relationship to cope with the stigma that society has placed on these relationships. Same-sex relationships have many of the same characteristics that heterosexual relationships possess. According to the research of Todosijevic, Rothblum, Solomon (2005) there are many factors contributing to the success of the same-sex relationship. Given the mixed results on demographic similarity and relationship satisfaction among same-sex couples, it is possible that couple similarity in level of outness may be more important for relationship satisfaction than couple similarity on demographic variables. For example, similarity on actual age (a demographic variable) may be less important than developmental stage in the coming out process (including level of disclosure to others). Couples who are discrepant on outness may have conflict around such issues as where to live (e.g., in an obvious gay neighborhood), whether to bring a partner to work-related social events, and how to introduce their partner to family members. Beals and Peplau (2001) found that discrepancy in openness among partners was not predictive of relationship satisfaction. In another study on this topic, Jordan and Deluty (2000) investigated the correlation between openness and relationship quality in 305 lesbians in committed relationships. Their results indicated that the degree of openness regarding sexual orientation was positively correlated with relationship satisfaction. They also concluded that discrepancy in openness in disclosure between partners was negatively correlated with relationship satisfaction. In addition, Jordan and Deluty (2000) discovered that negative affectivity (e.g., depression, anxiety, fear, anger, guilt, sadness, neuroticism) was not significantly correlated to relationship satisfaction. While, in a 45-year-long study of marital stability and marital satisfaction in 300 heterosexual couples, Kelly and Conely (1987) found that negative affectivity in both genders was negatively related to relationship satisfaction. This demonstrates the significance of same-sex relationships and how they appear much healthier than those of heterosexual partners. It is important that same-sex couples experience satisfaction in their relationships, but also find acceptance within the homosexual community. They experience a significant amount of distress from outside of the homosexual community. As a result they rely heavily on their peers to provide support. The gay lifestyle is a stressful lifestyle. In a study by Todosijevic, Rothblum, and Solomon (2005), gay couples reported experiencing a significant level of anxiety regarding contraction of HIV/AIDS. Further, gay and lesbian couples indicated facing stress from their families due to disapproval of the lifestyle such as rejection, lack of support, and lack of understanding by the family due to their sexuality (p. 165.) In their study of two hundred adolescents and early adult lesbians, Cantor and Neulinger (2000) reported that 47.5% of the interviewees disclosed having made some attempts at suicide at some point in their life. Thirty one percent of these lesbian adolescents and young adults who reported suicide attempts contributed it, at least partially, to their sexual orientation. Furthermore, in high school age males, 36% of the homosexual students surveyed reported having made a suicide attempt at some point in their life compared to 8.9% of their heterosexual counterparts (where is this information coming from?). Data such as this indicates the moral dilemma for the homosexual community, which creates unnecessary stress for homosexual individuals and their families. There are many milestones in life that homosexual individuals have a more difficult time achieving. Society paints a particular picture within which individuals are anticipated to fit snugly. Society expects homosexuals to conform to the norms that it has diligently created over the course of the history. A study was done recently that examined how the courts evaluate same-sex couples when they are attempting to adopt children (Connolly, 1998). The researchers found that the courts expect same-sex couples to conform as best possible to the traditional model of families. Since these couples are not allowed to marry, they are expected to demonstrate their commitment to each other in ways that heterosexual couples do not have to exhibit. Homosexual couples must realize that their demonstration of commitment must be more pronounced than heterosexual couples. They must also work to overcome their persuasion into the model in which the rest of society fits. As more and more same-sex couples are adopting or having children through artificial insemination, concerns regarding the integrity of family structure and developmental outcomes of children in these alternative families are brought to discussion. Golombok, et al. (2003) examined the quality of parent-child relationships, socioemotional and gender development in a community sample of lesbian parents with seven-year olds, and had a control group of heterosexual two-parent families. Demographics of both the lesbian and heterosexual families were similar. There were no statistically significant differences in mother-child relationships with regard to warmth toward child or emotional involvement. Family structure, not mothers sexual orientation, showed significant effects for overall parenting quality and enjoyment of motherhood. There were also no statistically significant differences in the frequency of conflicts with the child. Family structure, with single mothers, having more severe disputes (It seems like this sentence is missing something). Lesbian mothers also reported smacking their children less than heterosexual mothers. Lesbian mothers also engaged in more imaginative play with their children than heterosexual mothers, as single mothers did more often than heterosexual mothers. Fathers showed statistically significant higher levels of emotional involvement and frequency of smacking with their children than co-mothers. Socioemotional development showed no statistically significant difference in conduct problems, hyperactivity, emotional symptoms or positive social behavior as reported by mothers and teachers. The study also showed no differences in childrens behavior according to gender when comparing boys and girls in both heterosexual and lesbian families (Golombok, et al., 2003). Flaks, Ficher, Masterpasqua, Josephs (1995) compared lesbian couples with heterosexual parents and their children, ages three to nine. Their study found that sexual orientation of custodial parents is not a significant variable in successful development of the child and that there were no differences in children coming from divorced heterosexual or same-sex parent families. The purpose of their study was to address concerns of the courts when involved in custody cases. They showed no significant differences with parents sexual orientation or gender of child in outcomes of cognitive development or behavioral adjustment. The study did find that lesbian parents had more parenting awareness skills than heterosexual parents; this was statistically significant. This finding, with further statistical analysis, was shown to be related to gender, with mothers having better parenting skills than fathers. Wainright, Russell, Patterson (2004) examined family type heterosexual parents and same-sex parents, and outcomes in school, psychological adjustment and romantic relationships. Romantic relationships and sexual behavior was not associated with family type. The quality of the parent-child relationship determined better school adjustment. Anderssen, Amlie, Ytteroy (2002) reviewed twenty-three evidenced-based research studies from 1978 to 2000, assessing outcomes for children with lesbian or gay parents. Historically, the Scandanavian courts have not ruled against custody related to sexual orientation of the parent. However, evidenced based research regarding outcomes of children of same-sex parents is needed, since legal rights to adopt or become foster parents is not afforded to same-sex couples as they are to heterosexual couple. Emotional functioning was the outcome most often studied, followed by sexual preference, stigmatization, gender role behavior, behavioral adjustment, gender identity and cognitive functioning. No differences in emotional functioning were shown between same-sex (lesbian) parents and heterosexual parents. There were no differences in sexual preferences in offspring with parental sexual preference. Due to expressed negative attitudes which was received from outsiders, children of same-sex parents experienced stigmatization and teasing. The studies showed that few youngsters were teased no more than other children, and they developed stable relationships with peers as children of heterosexual parents (who said this?). There were no differences in gender role behavior, behavioral adjustment, and cognitive functioning. This significant research shows that the homosexual community faces difficult boundaries, restrictions, and stereotypes, but this community still manages to maintain relationships, raise their children, and live out daily life with less negative outcomes than heterosexual individuals. This leads into the Theory of Paradox with three stances on the subject of same-sex marriages showing negative and positive conclusions (question 6). Striving to protect the traditional family values, the concerned camp tends to be more conservative with their views on the family. The sanguine camp is more concerned with the welfare of the children, as well as the individual rights of people of all sexual orientations. The impatient camp seeks progress and respects all members of the community regardless of the concern for traditional family values. The concerned camp views same-sex marriage as an insult to the historical family unit and the foundations from which the family system was derived. The research indicates many stressors that are responsible for creating significant amount of anxiety, distress, and other negative reactions for those in the homosexual community. The research indicated that regardless of the homosexual lifestyle these individuals are still required to conform to traditional heterosexual family styles in order to adopt, regardless of the findings (This sentence is not clear. Regardless of what findings? Are there findings contrary to the outcome of court decisions on qualification of homosexual parents to adopt?). The teenagers living a homosexual lifestyle were also found to be more at risk for negative behaviors, including suicide. The concerned camp desires to see the traditional family unit remain intact for the welfare of all individuals, especially the children. The sanguine camp views recent family changes positively as indicators of the capacity of families to adapt to new environments rather than symptoms of decline. The sanguine camp concerns the positive results of these family changes for individuals, especially women. The sanguine argue that children have the capacity to overcome the emotional upheaval and long term consequences of divorce. The contenders of this view tend to focus on people who have thrived in the midst of family change. The sanguine camp believes marriage, commitment and nurturance to be unchanging core American values no matter what. According to the sanguine, the dramatic change in the last quarter century was not about family value but about norms and standards regarding appropriate or inappropriate behavior. For example, cohabitation before marriage has become common and one of four children is born outside of marriage but majority still want to be married. Regarding policy-making, the greatest concern for the sanguine camp is individual freedom. They want to keep the American core values and establish the institutional supports to help families through rapid changes. The impatient camp acknowledges the change and growth in the diversity of alternative families and their structure. Qualitative research is respected and much of the evidence regarding childrens behavioral and cognitive outcomes incorporates teacher responses along with parent responses. The research supports changes towards same-sex marriage and welcomes significant positive research findings to support their cause. This camp finds that families do face challenges, but ultimately have numerous opportunities to demonstrate their resilience through this alternative lifestyle (question 7). The families affected most by the failure to recognize same-sex marriages are those homosexual couples who have children. The family members of homosexual couples are also affected by the stereotypes that are involved with the homosexual lifestyle. Principle one addresses the question of if policies or programs set unrealistic expectations for families assuming financial and caregiving responsibilities of dependent, seriously ill or child with special needs. Principle two addresses family stability and explains that policies and programs should help maintain the stability of couples relationships, especially when children are involved (Bogenschneider, 2002). When looking at the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) from the perspective of a homosexual family, it does allow for incentives to marry in the state that recognizes homosexual marriages. With the current statue of DOMA, children may not have continued financial support from one of the parents if the homosexual parents separate (NCRF, 2004). Massachusetts legalization of same-sex marriage allows for the children of these families to have some financial security if their parents should divorce or if one of the parents were to die. The issue with the DOMA policy is that it does not allow for financial protection to non-biological children of same-sex relationships (Coolidge Duncan, 2001). Carlson (2004) found that DOMA actually protects the sanctity of heterosexual marriages by not allowing homosexuals to marry legally. The justification here is that homosexual relationships are sterile and that the children from these relationships will not have any kinship to, at a minimum, one of the parents and it could possibly be both of the parents. Carlson (2004) also found that marriage is an evolution in itself (questions 2-3). Question 4: Examine the Implementation of the Policy and Statute (p. 307) how has the Department implemented this policy? How has subsequent legislation (if any) revised this policy? Note: This flows right into question 5 below. Question 5: Go to page 306 and answer question #1 (Family Impact Questions): Reviewing rules, legislation, and laws to point out how legislation does or does not address families needs. The goal of the previous research and the comprehension of the policy is to allow the policy holders to see the detrimental results that have occurred as a result of the failure to recognize same-sex marriages. Homosexual families are suffering as a result of the failure to acknowledge the relationships that are closest to them. Children, according to the research, are well adjusted and develop normally but they are not able to develop socially because of the limitations that are placed on them from being a part of a homosexual family system.. They encounter numerous roadblocks and challenges as a result. The systems that surround them are also aversely affected creating much distress for all individuals that come in contact with each member of the family. The homosexual partners also experience significant distress as a result of the failure of the state of Texas to recognize any union between two individuals of the same sex. These individuals fight uphill battles daily with the simplest household activities, such as medical care/insurance, monetary matters, and significant custody concerns if children are involved. The recognition of same-sex marriages would allow these homosexual families to experience more acceptance and give them the opportunity to continue with normal, daily activities without hindrance (question 8). The recognition of same-sex marriages would alleviate significant amounts of stress from those families who are a part of a homosexual partnership. The recognition of this partnership would allow for society to also recognize the partnership leading to a more accepted perspective. The children in these families, as demonstrated in the research results, remain near the average mark in development, but continue to have difficulty comprehending and accepting the lifestyle affecting their emotional and social developments. Texas can alleviate this stress for these individuals by recognizing these same-sex marriages and providing the same right to homosexual couples that is provided to heterosexual individuals. Providing this recognition will allow for all families in the state of Texas to have the same resources, rights, and privileges creating a stronger, more united state, community, and families. References Anderssen, N., Amlie, C., Ytteroy, E. (2002). Outcomes for children with lesbian or gay parents. A review of studies from 1978-2000. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 335-351. Bogenschneider, K. (2002). Family policy matters. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates:NJ. p.94-97. Brewer, P., Wilcox, C. (2005). The Pollstrends: Same-sex marriage and civil unions. Public Opinion Quarterly, (69) 4, 599-616. Cantor, C., Neulinger, K. (2000). The epidemiology of suicide and attempted suicide among young Australians. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 34(3), 370-387. Connolly, C. (1998). The description of gay and lesbian families in second-parent adoption. Behavioral Sciences the Law: Special issue: Families and Courts, 16(2), 225-236. Flaks, D., Ficher, I., Masterpasqua, F., Joseph, G. (1995). Lesbians choosing motherhood: A comparative study of lesbian and heterosexual parents and their children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 105-114. Golombok, S., Perry, B., Burston, A., Murray, C., Mooney-Somers, J., Stevens, M., et al. (2003). Children with lesbian parents: A community study. Developmental Psychology, 39, 20-33. Jordan, K., Deluty, R. (2000). Social support, coming out, and relationship satisfaction in lesbian couples. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 4, 145164. Kelly, E., Conely, J. (1987). Personality and compatibility: A prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 2740. Lewis, R., Derlega, V., Berndt, A., Morris, L., Rose, S. (2001).An empirical analysis of stressors for gay men and lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 42, 6388. Meyer, I. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674 697. Pawelski, J., Perrin, E., Foy, J., Allen, C., Crawford, J., Del Monte, M., Kaufman, M., Klein, J., Smith, K., Springer, S., Tanner, J., Vickers, D., (2006). The Effects of marriage, civil union, and domestic partnership laws on the health and well-being of children. Pediatrics, (118)1, 349-364. Pope, S. (2004). The magisteriums arguments against same-sex marriage: An ethical analysis and critique. Theological Studies , 65(3), 530-555. Todosijevic, J., Rothblum, E., Solomon, S. (2005). Relationship satisfaction, affectivity, and gay-specific stressors in same-sex couples joined in civil unions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 158166.

Is Illegal Immigration Problem for United States - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 6 Words: 1785 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2019/02/20 Category Sociology Essay Level High school Tags: Illegal Immigration Essay Did you like this example? This essay will examine the issue of illegal immigration in the U.S. It is often referred to as a nation built by immigrants. Though, its history of immigration has not always been a welcoming one, particularly for certain groups. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Is Illegal Immigration Problem for United States?" essay for you Create order This uneven approach toward immigration has created a vital debate that has yet to be resolved within the country. It is significant to note that the topic of immigration is not, in itself, a real cause of division left or right in the United States. Firstly, unlike the UK and the rest of Europe, the United States is a land of immigrants historically. On the contrary, this continent is historically a land of emigration: For seven centuries, The Europeans preferred to go elsewhere to find a better life. This fact has the consequence that the vast majority of Americans see a positive view of immigration when many Europeans are afraid of this relatively new phenomenon (Cornelius, 2017). The problems associated with recent waves of immigration and the plight of illegal immigrants are the visible face of a lively social debate. Immigration is not a problem in itself Immigration is not a problem in itself, especially in the United States. However, it should specify â€Å"what immigration† is? For two centuries, massive immigration from all five continents took place in the United States, through a process of assimilation. Since the founding of the United States (1776), newcomers arrived and began to live the way Americans already lived through a more or less rapid process. To promote this, certain laws are implement to control the risk of immigration entry (Cornelius, 2017). There is no limit or prevent the new immigrant’s entry in America and Europe. Thus, through the quota system established by the American Federal government, between 2000 and 2009 an average of 91,000 green cards (work permits for immigrants in the United States) has been allocated per month. This means that on average 1.1 million new legal immigrants entered the American territory per year over the period 2000-2009. This figure has decreased slightly since 2009 as a result of economic stagnation in the United States (for a current annual average of about 1 million legal immigrants per year) (Cornelius, 2017). This represents an increase of 1% of American population every three years simply by immigration! And thats not counting illegal immigration. The Economic Point of View The problems brought t by the massive proportion of the population are illegally present today: From an economy view, these illegal immigrants are creating a situation of injustice from the perspective of work. They do not pay taxes because they do not exist in the files of tax (IRS), they are able to accept lower paying jobs(Cornelius, 2017). Many employers who, knowing the proportion of illegal in public around them, do not require proof of legal presence in the territory. They understand the value of having workers who accept lower wages because these employees will not have to give tax on income or assets as a result. U.S. legal immigrants or citizens in the country and find themselves at a disadvantage in the face of cheaper employees paid for equivalent net income. Entrepreneurial Point of View From an entrepreneurial point of view with a massive amount of people illegally present, it creates the perfect circumstances for the configuration of a parallel market. In the Border States in particular, moonlighting is present and absorbs a significant proportion of the local economy. From a tax perspective: beyond the tax not paid by illegal immigrants, many public institutions that do not require proof of the legality of a family in the area. Thus, many families illegally are able to take advantage of public school and hospital medical care (not including some social aid). These families do not pay taxes; the total cost is borne by American citizens and legal immigrants. Political Point of View From a political point of view: the presence of a large illegal population on American soil is very treacherous from a political opinion. In the America, it is not essential to present an identity card or passport in order to vote in an election. Republicans party always blame the Democrats win because they get votes from the illegal immigrants, who do not normally have the right to vote. Several laws to enforce verification of the nationality of the voters were presented in 2011 and 2012 by elected Republicans. Some states have managed to pass them, but majority Democrats have managed to postpone the vote of these proposals after the November 2012 elections or to defeat these proposed laws. These difficulties show that the major problem is the presence of such a mass of people in irregular situations. Both parties want to solve the problem, but politically face, mainly shots rhetoric. Within the two major parties themselves, the situation is far from simple. Thus, many Democrats wh o refuse the idea of a general regularization, Similarly, Republican side, many leaders want alternatives to the deportation of these populations. The problem of illegal immigration has always been a hot subject in US. For this reason, George W. Bush has remained very cautious pointing out that the United States remained a host society. The number of illegal immigrants currently present in the United States is estimated at around 12 million, or 1/3 of the 100.1 million residents of foreign origin. George W. Bush wants to find a compromise between amnesty and mass expulsion. In his speech to the US public, the president reiterated his opposition to amnesty, deemed â€Å"unfair to those who are already settled by law†, and at the same time window open to â€Å"many waves of illegal immigration† (Rosenblum, 1999).? Significant Tensions This debate bringing significant tensions, finding a way is particularly difficult. Between 2001 and 2006, President George W Bush wanted to go to a solution of regularization of the 12 million adults who are illegally present on the territory. He was especially included in its program during the 2004 campaign. However, he knew that the majority of the time, Republican, was opposed to such a solution. In 2007, the arrival of the new Democratic majority, President Bush took the opportunity to offer a very similar to that currently proposed reform (Heer, 2018). But he failed to get his project because the Republicans were opposing party and some Democrats wanted to take this opportunity to inflict a political defeat to the President at the time. This immigration policy in the United States it may be a solution for the UK and Europe? First, in Britain we do not as important as in the rest of Europe immigration (especially compared to France, Germany or England). Therefore, such an agreement, or even such a discussion would have little interest in Britain. To date, we have absolutely no similar situation that currently living the United States. However, some principles they apply or are considering applying can inspire us for an immigration policy in Britain. In this considered, it is significant to note that if there are statistics showing the number of individuals living in Britain however who were not born in France (about 85,000 in the territory of the Region of Brittany in four departments), it n statistics are not made on the French who immigrated to Britain, although this accounts for the vast majority of immigration at the territory Breton. This is a feature that remains strong and specific to the UK and non-independent nations (the same situation exists in Catalonia or Scotland for example). It is also n oted that, in general, without the French Breton origin who immigrated to Britain assimilate relatively well to local culture. This is particularly true in Lower Brittany. It should, however, some little temper this assertion for the cities of Nantes and Rennes (Heer, 2018). With a people of 4.5 million persons, if we desire to protect our culture, we must, we also (and especially us) pay attention to what immigration is not too massive in too little time. This means he must be prevented immigration? No, immigration is a good thing. If it is a labor migration, it is a strong indicator of the prosperity of a country. But this means that immigration should be a rhythm control in order to avoid situations of social distress of immigrants and to ensure their integration into our strong culture Celtic. The multiple demonstrations in support of immigrants who reunited millions of people in major US cities and the May 2006 strike day, the 2006 Great American Boycott, caught the attention of international media (Hanson, 2017). However, they are only the visible and â€Å"humanist† face of an often heated debate on the economic and military stakes or the social aspect of the reforms. There have been major protests against the use of the National Guard at the border concerns over the security of the rest of the US territory plus the historic and secular debate over the link between local authority and national guard, between civil law and military power. But if the social dimension is for Bush the framework of reflection from which his reform came, the president battered by the polls and facing a series of trials and adventures, must resolve to woo his own party by hammering the importance the framework of economic security and military use. Conclusion To conclude, the debate on â€Å"immigration† is key issue of the United States. It was estimated at an average of 500,000 individuals and more each year between 2000 and 2006, a total of about 12 million people illegally present on the territory in 2008. Added to this figure approximately 4 million children born in the U.S. territory (and therefore American citizens actually) whose parents illegally present for a total of about 16 million people illegally present or whose parents illegally present. America is proud of its multicultural roots and the attractiveness of its economy and society. This pride imposes political positions that would follow the evolution of the composition of the population. In his testament, Edward Said recalls, not without reason, that â€Å"America is a society of immigrant populations which is at present less composed of Northern Europeans than of Latinos, Africans and Asians; why would this fact not be reflected in â€Å"our† traditional values and â€Å"our† legacy? George W. Bush seems to share this approach. The US president is indeed in favor of the regularization of illegal immigrants, and proposes a rather open immigration policy, particularly towards Latin American countries, and considers that â€Å"immigration is the reflection of a trusting nation†. In this context, the new immigration policy strives to maintain a balance between the need to remain an attractive nation, and the Conservatives growing desire to control border flows. But this balance remains precarious, and the United States is engaged in a process that could, without providing an answer to the question â€Å"who are they? At least provide more specifi c guidance on â€Å"who do they want to be?†.

Friendship - 1379 Words

Friendship A friend is defined as a person whom one knows, likes, and trusts, therefore this is a friendship. In every society in the world people have and follow this relationship and support it. In some societies this relationship is given more importance than others. In our society friends are given almost the same attention as ones family member. Family is the closest relationship a person has, and if that is disturbed a friend can be very helpful. During the development of a friendship in the adolescence years is very important and it gives you positive influences on their behavior. Teenagers take their friendship very seriously, but what they don’t know is how harmful it may get. I believe that the friendship during the†¦show more content†¦True friends while never betray their friends behind their back or a two face. If they do betray you, they were just using you. Another example of friend are the flabby friends, they don’t give that much importance to a person l ife, their just there for the company or for whatever reason. Those friends are a waist of space and time. There are also the jealous friends, they are just around to make lives harder to enjoy. I had a friend Maria, and I was dating this guy who she also had a crush on, she will always try to make me cancel my dates with him just to be with her. One night while she went to get something to drink, she received a text message. I saw it! It was from the guy I was dating. So I started to look into her phone and I saw all the things she said about me and they were awful, and he said â€Å"I don’t believe you she’s not like that I know her well†. I told my friend that there was no reason to say those things to the person I’m dating and it’s not how a friend is supposed to act. If she had told me that she had gotten jealous because I was with the guy she liked, I would have gave up my interest to this guy, I don’t like having to get in a fight wit h my friends for men. She said â€Å"fine if you didn’t like how I act just leave†, I noticed she wasn’t my friend and I gathered my things and left. Having those type of friends just means that they want whatever you have and they would be satisfied. Jealous friends are a waste ofShow MoreRelatedFriendships : Friendships And Friendships896 Words   |  4 PagesFriendships Marlene Dietrich once said, â€Å"It is the friends that you can call at four a.m. that matter.† There are many different types of friendships. Casual friendships, opposite-sex friendships, and long term friendships are all examples of the different and common types of friendships used today. Casual friends are those you can text and hangout with every once in a while, without any sort of attachment. Friends of the opposite sex are those who help you with your relationships when you are havingRead MoreFriendship Between Friendship And Friendship1405 Words   |  6 PagesFriendship is a form of virtue and is indispensable for human life since man is a social being. There are three conditions necessary for friendship to exist: mutual goodwill, awareness of the other’s feelings in their connection, and awareness of their goodwill and attitude toward the other. According to Aristotle there are three types of friendships corresponding to the three objects of love. The first two types are similar and interconnected; they are friendship based on mutual utility and friendshipRead MoreFriendship Between Friendship And Friendship1520 Words   |  7 PagesFriendship is one of the most important things in life and everyone should learn how to maintain at least one true friendship. Not only is it beneficial to your happiness, it is constructive medicine in both your mental and physical health. Strong social networks and friendships may lengthen longevity, develop a healthier brain, survive cancer and heart disease better, as well as getting less colds, according to an Australian study. Without friendship, the world would be a dismal place, as friendsRead MoreThe Importance Of Friendship By A Friendship1106 Words   |  5 Pagesgot to grade you, From me you d get A+! To all friends, Friendship is one of life s greatest treasures. Friends that are loyal are always there to make you laugh when you are down, they are not afraid to help you avoid mistakes and they look out for your best interest. This kind of friend can be hard to find, but they offer a friendship that will last a lifetime. Other friends may not be quite as loving. The pain caused by a friendship marred by betrayal is not easy to overcome. In fact, manyRead MoreFriendship1486 Words   |  6 PagesSchreiner Paper 2 The Means Behind Friendship â€Å"Friendship is a virtue or at least involves virtue. It is necessary to life, since no one would choose to live without friends even if he had all other material goods. Friends are a refuge in times of poverty and misfortune; they help to guard the young from error; they help the old in their weakness, and help those in the prime of life to perform noble actions.† –Aristotle According to dictionary.com, the word friendship is defined as a person known wellRead MoreFriendships1385 Words   |  6 PagesBigelow and La Gaipa (1975) observed children’s friendships by asking a number of children to write an essay about their best friend using the approach called â€Å"content analysis†. William Corsaro however dictates that in order to study children you must study them in the context of their own peer culture, he used the â€Å"ethnographic approach†. In this essay I shall attempt to compare and contrast the approach used by Bigelow and La Gaipa (1975) and that taken by William Corsaro (2006). In the earlyRead MoreFriendship1166 Words   |  5 Pagesï » ¿Friends are the pearls of our life.. Friends are a necessity in every child’s life. They are there to comfort, to laugh with, and to create wonderful memories My Friendships have played an extremely important role in my life. I do not know where I would be without my friendships.   Friends to me are the people you know and enjoy being around and talking to. There are the best friends that are usually closer than the others and you are always with. What I find most important is being ableRead MoreFriendship1293 Words   |  6 Pagesscene and give me fake reasons as to why I should not be friends with so and so. That’s when I realized that she was manipulative and a compulsive liar. She would lie her guts off about anything and everything. After a while, I was done with that friendship. I wanted out, and fast too. Only there was one problem with this situation, she would guilt me. She would guilt me into sticking around! The worst part is that her own mother would be in on it too. They’d both beg and guilt me into being Alyssa’sRead MoreFriendship1339 Words   |  6 Pagesrelationships because it is full of friends.       There ought to be a course in school on friendship. Of course, some people are perfectly happy to operate with fewer friends. They might rather have a few deep and loyal friends, than many superficial ones. Others thrive best when friends are everywhere and numerous. It is not so much the number of friends that is important as is the possession of friends, period.       Friendship is a blessing, and a friend is the channel through whom great emotional, spiritualRead MoreFriendship869 Words   |  4 Pagesï » ¿Friendship is a relationship that all the individuals can create by themselves. Though it is not a god gifted relationship like that of the relationship of a mother, father, sister, brother or any of the other family but still it is one of the best relations an individual can possess. People who have true friends consider themselves as the luckiest individuals on earth. â€Å"Friendship is unnecessary, like philosophy, like art†¦ It has no survival value; rather it is one of those things that give value

Art is my stress reliever, my Zen free essay sample

Click. Click. Click. The sound the mouse makes as I take a timed concentration test. Click. Click. Click. The sound shatters my thoughts as I stare at my computer screen looking for the blue and red squares with blood shot eyes. It was the beginning of the 6th hour of testing couldn’t take it anymore! I wonder if you can change the clicking sound to a bark or a quack. What would it be like if every time you right clicked on the mouse, it would be a different sound? â€Å"Dang it!† I just missed four blue boxes. During my sophomore year, I was diagnosed with ADHD. The test took about seven hours and was filled with a lot of little tests on memory and repetition. I felt like a mouse in a test lab, each test was so small and miniscule. I felt as if I were uneducated because my 9 year old cousin could do these tests. We will write a custom essay sample on Art is my stress reliever, my Zen or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page At the end of the test, the doctor prescribed Ritalin AD for my condition. I didn’t enjoy the thought of being medicated and feeling sad and miserable and depressed and unhappy and dismal. Being diagnosed was supposed to force me to be interested in school which would hopefully allow me to get better grades in my classes. Ever since kindergarten I was never interested in academics. I wasn’t the student who would raise their hand to answer every question asked, or be the class spelling bee winner. I was the student who enjoyed being creative and getting her hands dirty. Ever since I can remember, my favorite part of school was anything dealing with art and using my imagination, whether it was making animal figures with play dough in first grade, practicing cursive writing in third grade or arts and crafts for each holiday that occurred throughout each year in elementary school. Art was always my thing. Art is my stress reliever, my Zen. I’m at peace when I put on my paint stained smock and sit down in front of an unfinished mural with a pallet in one hand and a brush in the other, mixing the paint â€Å"Swish, Swish, Swish† are the sounds it makes as I apply horizontal and vertical brush strokes to masterpiece. I can forget about what is going on around me and enter my imaginary world of bright colors, a place where I can let my mind sore with ideas and express myself through figures and forms and shapes silhouettes and shadows. All that matters is using my creativity, being keeping an open mind. What I have learned from the experience of being diagnosed is that, you can not force children to be interested in something they don’t like. I feel each student needs to realize what is important in their life for themselves so they will have self motivation to excel. When you pressure someone on something they don’t care about, it will only push them farther away. My art work is a resemblance of struggle, emotion, motivation , passion, incentive. Throughout my life I have gone through academic hardships and I strive to perfect my artistic ability by taking several art classes in order to improve my skills. I am my biggest critic; I make every effort to balance my compositions so they are appealing to the eye and use contrasting colors that capture the tones and shadows in objects. My work illustrates how I overcome my weaknesses and a continuation in my strengths to continue to be a successful artist.